Nettles

Nettles v. Paramedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20223:21-cv-08895California801 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SIMONE NETTLES, Case No. 21-cv-08895-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND; VACATING

HEARING

PARAMEDICS LOGISTICS

OPERATING COMPANY, LLC,

12 Defendant.

14 Before the Court is plaintiff Simone Nettles’s (“Nettles”) Motion to Remand, filed 15 December 17, 2021. Defendant Paramedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC 16 (“Paramedics”) has filed opposition, to which Nettles has replied. Having read and 17 considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court finds 18 the matter suitable for decision on the partis’ respective written submissions, VACATES 19 the hearing scheduled for January 21, 2022, and rules as follows: 20 1. Contrary to Nettles’s argument, the Court, for the reasons stated by 21 Paramedics, finds Nettles’s overtime claim is completely preempted by section 301 of the 22 Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185, see Curtis v. Irwin Indus., 23 Inc., 913 F.3d 1146, 1153-54 (9th Cir. 2019)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.