Mogan

Mogan v. Sacks, Ricketts & Case LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20223:21-cv-08431California489 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL MOGAN, Case No. 21-cv-08431-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

SACKS, RICKETTS & CASE LLP, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 53 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Michael Mogan seeks leave to file a motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 12, 2022 order imposing Rule 11 sanctions, arguing a manifest failure by the Court to consider material facts of dispositive legal arguments. ECF No. 53. Under Civil Local Rule 7-9(a), a motion for reconsideration may be granted before entry of judgment adjudicating all of the claims and rights and liabilities of all the parties in a case. Civ. L.R. 7-9(a). A motion for reconsideration may be made on three grounds: (1) a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented to the court, which, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, the moving party did not know at the time of the order for which reconsideration is sought; (2) the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.