Harris

Harris v. Door Dash, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20223:21-cv-09445California1,426 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEVIN JEROME HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-09445-JSC

Plaintiff,

SCREENING ORDER PURSUANT TO

v. 28 U.S.C. § 1915

DOOR DASH, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 1 Defendant.

12 The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Dkt. No. 4.) It must now review the complaint’s allegations under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because Plaintiff’s claims do not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, the Court gives Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS Plaintiff is a resident of North Carolina who drove for Defendant between November 2020 and November 2021. He alleges that he was sometimes paid as little as $2.50 per hour of work, in violation of his rights to minimum wage and overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). He also alleges that Defendant did not pay his mileage expenses, gas expenses, or hazard pay. After Plaintiff’s vehicle blew…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.