Flores

Flores v. Mediation Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20223:21-cv-09849California1,278 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JORGE FLORES, Case No. 21-cv-09849-JSC

Plaintiff,

SCREENING ORDER PURSUANT TO

v. 28 U.S.C. § 1915

MEDIATION SERVICES, Re: Dkt. No. 1 Defendant.

12 The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Dkt. No. 5.) It must now review the complaint’s allegations under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because Plaintiff’s claims do not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, the Court gives Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS Defendant “regularly operate[s] as [a] third-party debt collector[].” (Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 6.) On October 9, 2020, Defendant called Plaintiff and left the following pre-recorded voicemail message: Our offices are trying to get in touch with you in regards to a personal business matter. If you could please take the time to return our call, we would very much appreciate speaking with you directly. We can …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.