Arcsona Inc. v. Appirio Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ARCSONA INC., Case No. 21-cv-05019-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT
v. DANIEL LASCELL’S MOTION FOR
RULE 11 SANCTIONS
APPIRIO INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 60 Defendants.
13 Defendant Daniel Lascell moves for sanctions against plaintiff Arcsona Inc. (“Arcsona”) and its counsel, Michael Kelly, pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. No. 61. Mr. Kelly and Arcsona oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 64. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7- 1(b). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the applicable law, and the record presented, the Court denies Mr. Lascell’s motion for Rule 11 sanctions. I. BACKGROUND On March 18, 2021, Arcsona filed this action in the Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara, asserting one claim for promissory fraud against defendants Appirio Inc. (“Appirio”) and Mr.…