Tamrat

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HERMAN TAMRAT, Case No. 20-cv-01323-PJH

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ERICK RHODES, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 44 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a former county detainee and current state prisoner, proceeds with a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that defendant police officers Rhodes and Albini illegally arrested and detained him and used excessive force during the arrest. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the merits. Plaintiff filed an opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment is granted. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Legal Standard Summary judgment is proper where the pleadings, discovery and affidavits show that there is "no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Material facts are…