The Estate of B.H. v. Netflix, Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 THE ESTATE OF B.H., et al., Case No. 4:21-cv-06561-YGR Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH v. PREJUDICE NETFLIX, INC., Defendant. 1]

On January 12, 2022, the Court issued an order granting Netflix, Inc.’s special motion to strike pursuant to California anti-SLAPP statute, Cal. Code of Civ. Proc. § 425.16, as well as || Netflix’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 74.) Plaintiffs were A || directed to submit a statement indicating whether amendment would cure the deficiencies i || identified in the January 12, 2022 order. The statement has been received. (Dkt. No. 75.) Zz Given the Court’s order, plaintiffs agree at this time that amendment would be futile and || reserve the possibility of amendment after exhausting their appeal. Therefore, Netflix’s motions || are granted without leave to amend and the case is dismissed with…