Garcia

Garcia v. Boddum

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20224:21-cv-04926California1,424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORLANDO GARCIA, Case No. 21-cv-04926-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

JERRY BODDUM, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendants.

13 Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. Dkt. 17. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for January 27, 2022 is VACATED. Having read the papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action on June 28, 2021, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). Dkt. 1 at 5– 7. Plaintiff is an individual with cerebral palsy who uses a wheelchair for mobility. Id. at 1. Plaintiff alleges that structural barriers denied him meaningful access to the real property…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.