Bartelt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY B.,

Case No. 20-cv-03411-SK Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER REGARDING CROSS- MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

ANDREW M. SAUL, JUDGMENT

10 Defendant. Regarding Docket Nos. 25, 26

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Plaintiff Timothy B.’s motion for summary judgment and the cross-motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the motions have been submitted on the papers without oral argument. Having carefully considered the administrative record, the parties’ papers, and relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion and DENIES the Commissioner’s cross- motion for summary judgment for the reasons set forth below. The Court REMANDS this matter for further proceedings. BACKGROUND Plaintiff was born…