Anisetty

Anisetty v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20223:20-cv-05575California4,978 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SATHISH A., Case No. 20-cv-05575-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 38 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Sathish A. moves for summary judgment to reverse the decision of Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. ECF No. 28. Defendant cross- moves to affirm. ECF No. 38. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the matter is submitted without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion and DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion for the following reasons.2 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On November 19, 2015, Plaintiff filed an application for Social…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.