Briskin
Briskin v. Shopify Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRANDON BRISKIN, Case No. 21-cv-06269-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
SHOPIFY INC., et al., SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 29, 30, 36
13 Before the court are defendant Shopify Inc.’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 29), defendant Shopify USA Inc.’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 30), and plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (Dkt. 36). The matters are fully briefed and suitable for resolution without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for February 3, 2022, is VACATED. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (“SAC”). Leave to amend is freely given. Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 15. Courts commonly consider four factors when determining whether to grant leave to…