Johnson v. Opa Los Altos, LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20225:21-cv-04307California2,224 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-04307-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS ADA CLAIM FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION;

OPA LOS ALTOS, LP, et al., DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OVER UNRUH ACT

Defendants. CLAIM [Re: ECF No. 21]

13 Before the Court is a motion to dismiss brought by Defendants Opa Los Altos LP and Opa Management Group, Inc. (“Opa”). ECF No. 21 (“Mot.”); see also ECF No. 24 (“Reply”). Opa argues that Plaintiff Scott Johnson’s lone federal claim—brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §12101, et seq.—is moot because Opa has ceased all business operations and permanently vacated the premises at issue. Johnson opposes the motion. ECF No. 23 (“Opp.”). The Court agrees with Opa that the ADA claim is moot, and for the following reasons GRANTS Opa’s motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.