Genfit S. A. v. CymaBay Therapeutics

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20223:21-cv-00395California5,479 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GENFIT S. A., Case No. 21-cv-00395-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

CYMABAY THERAPEUTICS INC., Defendant.

12 Before the Court is defendant CymaBay Therapeutics Inc.’s (“CymaBay”) motion, filed November 8, 2021, to dismiss plaintiff GENFIT S.A.’s (“GENFIT”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. GENFIT has filed opposition, to which CymaBay has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND2 GENFIT is a “late-stage clinical biopharmaceutical company” engaged in developing treatments for patients suffering from primary biliary cholangitis (“PBC”), a “liver-related” disease for which there is currently no cure. (See SAC ¶¶ 19, 22-23.) Clinical trials, which “involve the administration of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.