Jones

Jones v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20224:21-cv-04172California8,141 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEFFREY M. JONES, et al., Case No. 21-cv-04172-DMR

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 12 STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiffs Jeffrey M. Jones and Shannon B. Jones, Trustees of the Jeffrey & Shannon Jones Trust (the “Joneses”), filed a complaint against Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company (“State Farm”) alleging claims related to 2017 landslides which damaged their property. State Farm now moves pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint. [Docket No. 12.] For the following reasons, the motion is granted with leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiffs make the following allegations in the complaint, all of which are taken as true for purposes of this motion. The Joneses bought real property located at 5945 Bruce Drive in Danville, California (the “Jones property”) in 2016. Compl. ¶¶ 1, 13. Tzen-Wen Guo and Bihwan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.