Guzman

Guzman v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20225:21-cv-09133California1,965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SALVADOR GUZMAN, and others, Case No. 21-cv-09133-NC Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION

TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO

WALMART INC., and others, AMEND Defendants. Re: ECF 9 15 On December 1, 2021, Defendants Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (collectively Walmart) filed a motion to dismiss all of the claims in this case except Plaintiffs’ minimum wage claim. ECF 9. Walmart argues that: (1) the meal period, reporting time, and overtime violation allegations fail to state a claim, (2) the wage statement violation claim constitutes improper double recovery, (3) the Unfair Competition Law claim does not adequately allege the lack of remedy at law, and (4) the claims predicated on California Labor Code § 204 are improper because § 204 does not establish a private right of action. After reviewing the briefing, the Court grants Walmart’s motion to dismiss and grants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.