Redfern

Redfern v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20223:20-cv-01175California1,895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRETT REDFERN, Case No. 20-cv-01175-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES,

COSTS AND EXPENSES

FCA US LLC, Docket No. 44 Defendant.

12 13 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Brett Redfern’s motion for attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses. Having considered the papers submitted, the Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. The hearing on the motion is therefore VACATED. The motion for fees, costs, and expenses is GRANTED; however, the Court does not award all fees requested. I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Mr. Redfern filed this lemon law case, asserting claims under the California Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, in state court in January 2020. He asserts that, in October 2018, he bought a new 2018 Ram 2500 (for about $60,500), see Compl. ¶ 8, Daghighian Decl. ¶ 12; but that it immediately had a number of serious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.