Young

Young v. Chao

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20223:19-cv-01411California8,401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHERYL YOUNG, Case No. 19-cv-01411-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PETE BUTTIGIEG, Re: Dkt. No. 69 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Cheryl Young, pro se, seeks de novo review of discrimination and retaliation claims where she prevailed on the merits in administrative proceedings but was dissatisfied with position offered for reinstatement, which the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) ultimately held, over Young’s objection, to be equivalent to her past position with the U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”). The Court previously dismissed the case with prejudice, in part based on the applicable statute of limitations, but the Ninth Circuit reversed as to that issue. Defendant Pete Buttigieg, the Secretary of Transportation (the “Secretary”), moves for summary judgment or again to dismiss, arguing again that Young’s claims are barred by the statute of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.