Johnson v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-05646-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

DANIEL H. SMITH, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Scott Johnson seeks a court order requiring Defendants Daniel and Wilma Smith to bring their store, Stucco Supply, into full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. Defendants move to dismiss Johnson’s claims, arguing they are moot and that he lacks standing to pursue injunctive relief. ECF No. 13. Johnson filed an Opposition (ECF No. 15) and Defendants filed a Reply (ECF No. 16). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the February 17, 2022 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion for the following…