People.ai, Inc. v. Clari Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PEOPLE.AI, INC., No. C 21-06314 WHA Plaintiff,
v.
CLARI INC., ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT
15 INTRODUCTION The day before the hearing on a motion for judgment on the pleadings of patent ineligibility, the patent owner filed the instant motion for leave to amend the complaint, adding allegations regarding the technical improvements recited by the claims-in-suit as well as the inventive concept they capture. An order granted the alleged infringer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, holding all asserted claims of the seven patents-in-suit ineligible under Section 101 after conducting an Alice analysis. Because permitting this amendment after the patent owner’s undue delay would be futile and prejudicial to the alleged infringer, the motion is DENIED. STATEMENT The recent order granting defendant Clari Inc.…