Asetek Danmark A/S v. Coolit Systems Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20223:19-cv-00410California1,114 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ASETEK DANMARK A/S, Case No. 19-cv-00410-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER

COOLIT SYSTEMS INC, et al., Docket No. 347 Defendants.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Defendant CoolIT filed a motion for relief from a nondispositive order issued by Magistrate Judge Beeler on November 30, 2021 (Docket No. 343) denying CoolIT’s motion for leave to amend infringement contentions (Docket No. 272). Motion (“Mot.”); Docket No. 347. Having considered the submissions of the parties, this Court DENIES CoolIT’s motion for the following reasons. II. DISCUSSION Defendants argue that the Order “is internally inconsistent and fails to adequately engage with the key question presented—namely, whether the SKUs CoolIT seeks to enumerate in its infringement contentions do or do not correspond to Accused Products under the currently 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.