Johnson v. Fogli Family Enterprises, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20223:21-cv-07009California305 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-07009-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

v. COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

FOGLI FAMILY ENTERPRISES, LLC, et JURISDICTION al., 12 Defendants. 13 On January 26, 2022, defendants moved to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. That motion primarily addresses standing and does not address supplemental jurisdiction. In addition to addressing the arguments defendants have raised, plaintiff Scott Johnson is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why, if the Court determines that it has subject matter jurisdiction over Johnson’s federal claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Johnson’s state-law Unruh Act claim for the reasons stated in Arroyo v. Rosas, 19 F.4th 1202 (9th Cir. 2021). Although that decision held that a district court erred in declining to exercise jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.