Silloway

Silloway v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20223:20-cv-07400California291 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 KRISTEN SILLOWAY, et al., Case No. 20-cv-07400-RS (AGT) Plaintiffs, , y. DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 56 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO,

? Defendant. 10 The undersigned has reviewed the parties’ joint discovery letter at Dkt. 56. Plaintiffs’ || request for an order compelling CCSF to do the following—to produce privileged documents || reflecting legal advice CCSF received concerning its FLSA compliance, to answer plaintiffs’ 14 || interrogatories regarding CCSF’s good faith affirmative defense, and to reopen the Rule 30(b)(6) || deposition of Steve Ponder to allow further inquiry as to “any attorney advice related to || compliance with the FLSA” (see id. at 1)—is denied. While CCSF has asserted a good faith || affirmative defense against plaintiffs’ FLSA claim, it has not “affirmatively put the content of || privileged communications or advice behind its claim of good faith” as required to find…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.