Kyle Zoellner v. Eric Losey

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20223:18-cv-04471California2,885 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KYLE CHRISTOPHER ZOELLNER, Case No. 18-cv-04471-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

CITY OF ARCATA, et al., AND TO AMEND COMPLAINT Defendants. Docket No. 201

12 13 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Kyle Christopher Zoellner’s motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration and to amend the operative fifth amended complaint (“5AC”). Having considered the parties’ briefs, the Court hereby DENIES the motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration and DENIES the motion for leave to amend. I. DISCUSSION Previously, the Court dismissed with prejudice Mr. Zoellner’s § 1983 claims against the City of Arcata (“City”) as well as his § 1983 claims against individual defendants predicated on supervisory liability. See Docket Nos. 93, 131 (orders). In the pending motion, Mr. Zoellner asks for leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.