Wingo

Wingo v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20224:21-cv-09000California481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSICA WINGO, Case No. 21-cv-09000-PJH Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. STAY

H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P., Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 13-2 Defendant.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, stay came on for hearing before this court on January 27, 2022. Plaintiff appeared through her counsel, Deanna Leifer. Defendant appeared through its counsel, Andrew Satenberg. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion to stay for the following reasons. This matter is one of two class action lawsuits brought against defendant for alleged violations of California wage-and-hour laws. The other matter in question is Gonzalez v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P. et al, Case No. 21-cv-0161 (“Gonzalez”), which is proceeding before the U.S. District Court in the Central District of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.