Shields

Shields v. Federation Internationale De Natation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20223:18-cv-07393California1,770 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS A. SHIELDS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07393-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO STRIKE

v. SUR-REPLY

FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE DE Re: Dkt. No. 269

NATATION,

11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is pending before the Court. At the October 21, 2021 case management conference, FINA asked for permission to file a sur-reply that addressed what FINA characterized (and Plaintiffs disputed) as a change in Plaintiffs’ expert’s damages theory. The Court granted FINA leave to file a 15-page sur-reply. (Dkt. Nos. 254, 268.) FINA filed its sur-reply on November 23, 2021. (Dkt. No. 263.) While the sur-reply addresses the expert damages theory issue, the first few pages disclose confidential settlement communications in an attempt to argue that the named Plaintiffs are not adequate class representatives. As a result of the disclosure, the settlement judge withdrew from facilitating settlement discussions. (Dkt. No. 265.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.