Stewart
Stewart v. Department of Consumer Affairs of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SELENE FUMIE STEWART, Case No. 21-cv-07674-EMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER Docket No. 16 AFFAIRS OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 On January 20, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and entered judgment. Docket Nos. 14. 15. On January 27, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s dismissal order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and L.R. 7-9. Docket No. 16. Because the Court has already entered judgment in this case, Plaintiff’s motion is construed under the applicable legal standards as a motion for amendment or alteration of judgment or relief from final judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), 60(b). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. I. LEGAL STANDARD Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), a judgment may be altered or amended only…