San Francisco Baykeeper v. Sunnyvale

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20225:20-cv-00824California3,996 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER,

Lead Case No. 5:20-cv-00824-EJD Plaintiff, Consolidated with No. 5:20-cv-00826 EJD v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART

CITY OF SUNNYVALE, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE

PORTIONS OF THE EXPERT Defendant. TESTIMONY OF BRANDON STEETS; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

EXCLUDE PORTIONS OF THE

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, EXTENT TESTIMONY OF MARK

BERKMAN

Plaintiff,

RE: DKT. NOS. 98,

v.

CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW,

Defendant.

Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper (“Plaintiff”) initiated these suits against Defendants City of Sunnyvale (“Sunnyvale”) and City of Mountain View (“Mountain View”) under the citizen suit enforcement provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.