Coronavirus Reporter v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20223:21-cv-05567California2,334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CORONAVIRUS REPORTER, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05567-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION

AND RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

APPLE INC., Docket Nos. 87, 91 Defendant.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs brought this action for antitrust and RICO violations, and breach of contract and fraud against Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) to challenge Apple’s allegedly monopolist operation of its “App Store” through “curation” and “censor[ship]” of smartphone apps. Docket No. 41 (“FAC”) ¶¶ 1-2. On November 30, 2021, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice for failure to state claims and entered judgment. Docket Nos. 85, 86. Now pending are Plaintiffs motions for reconsideration and relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), 60(b). Docket Nos. 87, 91. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for February 10,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.