Garcia

Garcia v. McDowell

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20225:16-cv-05301California1,959 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESEQUIEL “PAUL” GARCIA,

Case No. 16-05301 BLF (PR) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. DISCOVERY

14 NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Respondent.

(Docket No. 82) 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court found the second amended petition (“SAP”), Dkt. No. 35, stated cognizable claims, and ordered Respondent to show cause why the petition should not be granted. Dkt. No. 37. Respondent has filed an answer along with exhibits in support. Dkt. Nos. 56-59. Petitioner was granted four extensions of time to file a traverse, Dkt. Nos. 63, 65, 71, 81, which he finally filed on July 2, 2021. Dkt. No. 83. The Court also notes Petitioner’s notice of scanning errors and request to incorporate missing pages. Dkt. No. 84. Before the Court is Petitioner’s motion for leave to conduct discovery…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.