Ramachandran
Ramachandran v. City of Los Altos
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SATISH RAMACHANDRAN, Case No. 18-cv-01223-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE
v. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, CITY OF LOS ALTOS, et al., 276, 277, 278, 279 Defendants.
13 The Court held a pretrial conference in this matter on January 27, 2022. Dkt. No. 297. This order resolves defendants’ motions in limine. Dkt. Nos. 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279.1 I. DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE A. Motion in Limine No. 1 (Racial Discrimination or Disparate Treatment) Defendants move to exclude any evidence or argument about racial discrimination or disparate treatment. Defendants argue that Mr. Ramachandran’s remaining claims are premised on the allegation that he was retaliated against for engaging in activity protected by the First Amendment, and not because of his race or national origin. Dkt. No. 270. Defendants argue further that the Court granted summary judgment in their…