In Re Glumetza Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20223:19-cv-05822California8,490 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re No. C 19-05822 WHA GLUMETZA ANTITRUST No. C 19-05831 WHA LITIGATION. No. C 19-06138 WHA No. C 19-06156 WHA No. C 19-06839 WHA This Document Relates to: No. C 19-07843 WHA

No. C 19-05822 WHA (Consolidated) No. C 19-06138 WHA No. C 19-06839 WHA ORDER RE FINAL APPROVAL OF

CLASS SETTLEMENTS AND

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

15 16 INTRODUCTION In this antitrust action, defendant brand and generic manufacturers of a type 2 diabetes drug engaged in a reverse-payment scheme and agreed not to compete with each other by delaying the introduction of a generic version of the drug for several years. On the precipice of trial, the direct-purchaser class reached settlement agreements with all defendants. To the extent stated, the motion for final approval of the settlements is GRANTED. Class counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.