Gastelum

Gastelum v. Blue Diamond Hospitality LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20225:21-cv-06234California314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 5:21-cv-06234-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS AS MOOT

v.

BLUE DIAMOND HOSPITALITY LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 23 Defendant.

13 Before the Court is Defendant Blue Diamond Hospitality LLC’s (“Blue Diamond”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum’s complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Dkt. No. 23. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Gastelum’s response to that motion is due on February 8, 2022. On February 4, 2022, in lieu of filing an opposition to Blue Diamond’s motion and before Blue Diamond filed a responsive pleading to the original complaint, Gastelum filed an amended complaint. Dkt. No. 27. A plaintiff may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days of service of a motion under Rule 12(b). Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). An amended pleading generally supersedes an original pleading. Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.