(HC) Trotter v. State of CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20223:22-cv-00753California244 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES TROTTER, No. 2:22-cv-00141 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges the execution of his sentence. As a general rule, “[t]he proper forum to challenge the execution of a sentence is the district where the prisoner is confined.” Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Petitioner is incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison which is located within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. In the interest of justice, the court will transfer this action to the Northern District. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that his matter is transferred to 2 || the United States District Court for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.