Flores-Mendez

Flores-Mendez v. Zoosk, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20223:20-cv-04929California5,039 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN FLORES-MENDEZ, an individual and AMBER COLLINS, an individual, and on behalf of classes of similarly situated No. C 20-04929 WHA individuals,

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE MOTION TO AMEND

v. 14 ZOOSK, INC., a Delaware corporation, 15 Defendant.

INTRODUCTION In this putative class action by data-breach victims, plaintiffs move for leave to file a third amended complaint. For the reasons that follow, and to the extent stated, the motion is GRANTED. STATEMENT A prior order detailed the facts (Dkt. No. 93). In brief, plaintiffs Juan Flores-Mendez and Amber Collins used defendant Zoosk, Inc.’s online dating platform. Zoosk offered a free service. It also offered a premium subscription service for a fee. As alleged, all customers provided their personal information to Zoosk upon joining. Zoosk’s website posted its privacy policy, which allegedly contained the company’s data-security-related representations. Plaintiffs allege injury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.