Trofimchuk

Trofimchuk v. BitClave PTE, Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20223:21-cv-07003California3,611 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 VASILY TROFIMCHUK, Case No. 21-cv-07003-CRB

Appellant,

ORDER AFFIRMING BANKRUPTCY

v. COURT

BITCLAVE PTE, LTD., Appellee.

Appellant Vasily Trofimchuk (“Trofimchuk”) appeals U.S. Bankruptcy Judge M. Elaine Hammond’s order granting summary judgment to Appellee BitClave on BitClave’s non- dischargeability claim of fraud. See Appellant Br. (dkt. 4). Trofimchuk argues that the bankruptcy court erred by applying issue preclusion in ruling on the motion. Id.; Appellant Reply Br. (dkt. 8). Because issue preclusion was appropriate under these circumstances, the Court AFFIRMS the bankruptcy court. I. BACKGROUND A. Santa Clara Superior Court In May 2018, BitClave brought suit in Santa Clara Superior Court against Trofimchuk, Pavel Trofimchuk (Trofimchuk’s brother), Astra Inc. d/b/a Astra Studio, and Astra Studio. See MSJ Order (dkt. 5-2) at 43. It filed an amended complaint (“FAC”) in November…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.