Hsu

Hsu v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20223:11-cv-02076-WHACalifornia1,929 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRU K. HSU, Plaintiff, No. C 11-02076 WHA

v.

UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., ORDER RE PREFILING REVIEW AS

TO PLAINTIFF DARRU K. HSU

Defendant.

INTRODUCTION This order arises from a putative class action dismissed in August 2011. For the reasons that follow, this order designates pro se plaintiff a vexatious litigant and ORDERS PRE-FILING REVIEW to the extent stated herein of future filings by plaintiff and about defendant. STATEMENT The background of this case is set forth in our prior orders (Dkt. Nos. 35, 69, 94, 110, 116). In brief, plaintiff Darru K. Hsu entered into a wrap agreement with defendant UBS Financial Services, Inc. for investment and advisory services. Hsu brought this action under the Investment Advisers Act, alleging that USB provided services “in its capacity as an investment advisor,” but that a “hedge clause” in his agreement with USB impermissibly …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.