1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 ORLANDO GARCIA, Case No. 21-cv-03743-JCS
Plaintiff,
ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE
v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION
AND DISMISSING STATE CLAIM
JESUS GARCIA MACIEL, et al.,
Defendants.
I. INTRODUCTION On January 3, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff Orlando Garcia to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Garcia’s state-law Unruh Civil Rights Act claim for the reasons stated in Arroyo v. Rosas, 19 F.4th 1202 (9th Cir. 2021). See dkt. 33. As ordered, Garcia has addressed that question in his opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss on other grounds. The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons discussed below, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, and DISMISSES Garcia’s Unruh Act claim sua sponte, without prejudice to pursuing that claim in state court.1 Resolving Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss Garcia’s ADA…