Erickson Productions Inc v. Kraig R Kast

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20224:13-cv-05472California3,519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ERICKSON PRODUCTIONS INC, et al., Case No. 13-cv-05472-DMR

Plaintiffs,

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’

v. FEES AND COSTS

KRAIG RUDINGER KAST, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 413 Defendants.

Plaintiffs Erickson Productions, Inc. (“Erickson Productions”) and Jim Erickson (together, “Erickson”) filed a motion pursuant to the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 505, for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs in this copyright infringement action. [Docket No. 382.] In a prior order, the court granted Erickson’s fee motion in part, finding that Erickson had established that an award of fees and costs was appropriate under the Copyright Act but that the court was unable to determine the amount of such an award on the existing record. [Docket No. 410 (Aug. 31, 2021 Order).] Therefore, the court ordered Erickson to resubmit evidence supporting his request for a fee award. Id. Erickson timely submitted the supplemental evidence, to which pro se Defendant Kraig…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.