Wang
Wang v. Ehang Holdings Limited
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 GARY WANG, Case No. 20-cv-00569-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONTINUE TRIAL
EHANG HOLDINGS LIMITED, et al., [Re: ECF 97] Defendants.
13
15 The Court has reviewed Defendants’ administrative motion to continue the trial (ECF 97) and Plaintiff’s opposition thereto (ECF 98). The motion is DENIED for the reasons discussed below. A scheduling order “may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation, and its decisions regarding the preclusive effect of a pretrial order . . . will not be disturbed unless they evidence a clear abuse of discretion.” Zivkovic v. S. California Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). “Rule 16(b)’s ‘good…