Kijakazi

Werts Rosemayer v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20221:20-cv-06310California2,544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 CHRISTOPHER WERTS ROSEMAYER, Case No. 20-cv-06310-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 22, 26 ANDREW SAUL, Defendant.

13 Now pending before the court in this Social Security case are two motions seeking remand under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) – Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. 22) (seeking a remand with instructions for immediate payment of benefits), and Defendant’s Motion for Remand (dkt. 26) (seeking a remand for further proceedings). Both Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (dkts. 10, 11), the Administrative Record1 has been filed, all briefing is complete, and the case is now ripe for decision. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s motion is granted in part and denied in part, and Defendant’s motion is granted such that the case is remanded for further proceedings. On November 21, 2017 and February 28, 2018, Plaintiff respectively filed applications…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.