Pallazhco
Pallazhco v. Acevedo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICARDO PALLAZHCO, Case No. 21-cv-00378-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR
v. SANCTIONS
A. ACEVEDO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Defendant A. Acevedo’s motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(d). (Dkt. No. 13.) Defendant served interrogatories and requests for production on Plaintiff on September 21, 2021. (Dkt. No. 13-2 ¶ 2.) Responses were originally due on October 25. (Id. ¶ 3.) On October 28, Plaintiff’s counsel and Defendant’s counsel spoke about an unrelated matter and Defendant’s counsel agreed to an extension to November 24. (Id. ¶¶ 4–5.) On December 8, Defendant’s counsel asked Plaintiff’s counsel by email to let her know by December 15 when he planned to respond. (Id. ¶¶ 6–8.) Defendant’s counsel noted that she would file a motion to compel if she did not hear from Plaintiff’s counsel by December 15. (Id. ¶ 9.) Plaintiff’s counsel did not respond,…