Arunachalam

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, Case No. 3:22-cv-00056-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 13 LELAND DAVIS, Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Lakshmi Arunachalam, who is pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis, objects to the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler, which recommended dismissal of this case. See Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [Dkt. No. 10]; Objection to R&R [Dkt. No. 11]. Because Arunachalam is proceeding in forma pauperis, Judge Beeler screened and dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). For the reasons that follow, Arunachalam’s objections are OVERRULED and this case is DISMISSED.1 Defendant Leland Davis is a judge on the California Superior Court who Arunachalam has sued because, as Judge Beeler put it, “he did not rule her way. She contends that he ‘terrorized’ her, declared her a vexatious litigant, and issued adverse rulings.” R&R (citing Complaint (“Compl.”) [Dkt No. 1] ¶¶ 11, 14, 16, 18). The…