Lenk

Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20225:20-cv-08094California580 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 KENNETH LAWRENCE LENK, Case No. 20-cv-08094-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION TO AMEND OR ALTER

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(e) Defendant. [Re: ECF 34]

13 The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (ECF 34), Defendant’s opposition (ECF 38), and Plaintiff’s reply (ECF 41). The motion was not noticed for hearing, and the Court finds it suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), a party may file a motion to alter or amend a judgment within 28 days after the entry of the judgment. The Ninth Circuit has identified “four basic grounds upon which a Rule 59(e) motion may be granted: (1) if such motion is necessary to correct manifest errors of law or fact upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.