Olsen

Olsen v. Hortica Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20225:21-cv-03891California4,395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DAVID OLSEN, Case No. 5:21-cv-03891-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v.

HORTICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 9 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff David Olsen brings this action asserting violations of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) against Defendant Hortica Insurance Company (“Hortica”), a subsidiary of Sentry Insurance Company (“Sentry”), alleging the following claims: (1) hostile work environment harassment in violation of Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940; (2) failure to prevent harassment, discrimination, or retaliation in violation of Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(k); (3) “disparate treatment” discrimination in violation of Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(a); and (4) disability discrimination in violation of Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(m). Compl., Dkt. No. 1-1. Sentry1 moves to dismiss all claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Def. Sentry Ins. Co.’s Not. of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.