Erickson Productions Inc v. Kraig R Kast

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ERICKSON PRODUCTIONS INC, et al., Case No. 13-cv-05472-DMR

Plaintiffs, ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS v. TO STAY

KRAIG RUDINGER KAST, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 397, 412 Defendants.

Pro se Defendant Kraig Kast filed a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62 to stay the proceedings to enforce the February 12, 2021 judgment, including post-judgment discovery. [Docket No. 397.] Plaintiffs Erickson Productions, Inc. (“Erickson Productions”) and Jim Erickson (together, “Erickson”) oppose the motion. [Docket No. 400.] After the court denied Kast’s motion for a new trial or to amend the judgment and granted in part Erickson’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs but before the court ruled on the pending motion to stay, Kast filed another motion to stay the proceedings and enforcement of the judgment. [Docket No. 412.] These matters are suitable for decision without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the…