Conso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 MOLLY CRANE CONSO, Case No. 21-cv-04480-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 21 CITY OF EUREKA, et al., Defendants.

13 Now pending before the court are two motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (dkt. 16); one of which (dkt. 21) has been filed by the City of Eureka (“City”) and its police chief, Steve Watson (“Chief Watson”), while the other (dkt. 20) has been filed by the County of Humboldt (“County”) and its sheriff, William Honsal (“Sheriff Honsal”). Both motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for decision.1 As discussed in greater detail below, while Plaintiff has properly pleaded her case against the Doe Defendants by whom she claims she was unjustifiably struck with projectiles during a public protest, her attempts to drag the City, the County, Chief Watson, and Sheriff Honsal into the case and to recast her claims into various other molds…