Mendoza

Smith v. Mendoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20225:19-cv-03750California5,591 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JASON SMITH, Case No. 19-cv-03750-BLF (PR)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

J MENDOZA, et al., (Docket No. 52) Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on or about June 27, 2019. Dkt. No. 1. The Court found the complaint, liberally construed, stated cognizable claims and ordered service of the action on Defendants. Dkt. No. 3. On March 10, 2021, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 45. The only remaining claims were First and Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant Zavala, and a First Amendment claim against Defendant Perez-Pantoja. Id. at 34. Defendant Zavala was permitted to file a summary judgment motion on the remaining claims against her; the claim against Defendant Perez-Pantoja was to be referred to settlement proceedings after the adjudication…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.