Harnden

Harnden v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20224:21-cv-09231California3,372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEFFREY S. HARNDEN, Case No. 21-cv-09231-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE

DENIED; DENYING AS MOOT

PEREZ, et al., REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 11,

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at California Medical Facility (“CMF”) in Vacaville, California, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 11, and his request for an extension of time to provide proof of his indigent status, Dkt. No. 14. DISCUSSION I. Request for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis A. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) This action is governed by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996 (“PLRA”) which was enacted, and became effective, on April 26, 1996. The PLRA provides that a prisoner may not bring…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.