B.
B. v. City of Oakland
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ZELDA B., et al., Case No. 21-cv-07078-DMR
Plaintiffs,
ORDER ON DEFENDANT OAKLAND
v. UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S
MOTION TO DISMISS
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendants.
Plaintiffs Phyllis A. Thomas and Charles A. Thomas, Sr. along with their adult children and two minor grandchildren filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming they suffered constitutional violations while attending a high school basketball game in February 2020. Defendant Oakland Unified School District (“OUSD”) now moves pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(e) to dismiss the complaint and/or for a more definite statement.1 [Docket No. 25.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs make the following allegations in the complaint, all of which are taken as true for …