Bush

Bush v. Sonoma West Holdings Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20223:21-cv-08853California2,547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIAM D. BUSH, Case No. 21-cv-08853-JCS

Plaintiff, ORDER GRATING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SONOMA WEST HOLDINGS INC, et al. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 1,

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff William Bush, pro se, has applied to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. 2. Sufficient cause having been shown, that application is GRANTED. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Bush’s complaint against Defendants Sonoma West Holdings Inc. (“Sonoma West”) and Michael Babbini under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). For the reasons discussed below, Bush is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed, by filing a response to this order no later than March 15, 2022. If Bush does not respond to this order by that date, the case will be reassigned to a United States district judge with a recommendation that it be dismissed with prejudice. The case management conference…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.